European construction product data
from a digital transformation to a circular economy, a tentative forecast.
Read moreEuropean construction product data
Whilst the European Commission regularly underlines the importance of the European construction industry, the industry seldom makes the headlines. However, the numerous technological developments grouped under the digital construction banner now bring renewed interest. This welcomed focus, combined with our 30th anniversary, gives us the opportunity to look ahead and try to outline the upcoming trends that will shape data delivery soon.
Over the last years, our work concentrated on the Construction Products Regulation (CPR) and the EU sustainable construction agenda. The latter was defined by our dedicated European CEN standard – EN 15804 - which guides the delivery of Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) to the market. After many years of work, this voluntary product level declaration was suddenly challenged by the European Commission through the publication of their Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) initiative. The European construction products industry had been a leader in sustainability declaration but had failed to promote its use for building assessment. With the more recent launch of Level(s) - a voluntary reporting framework to improve the sustainability of buildings - by the European Commission, we hope the gap will be finally bridged. The competing PEF4buildings, also developed by Commission services, should be mentioned because it truly illustrates the need for consensus and harmonisation.
Looking ahead and based on the compromises made between PEF, EPDs and Level(s), we can foresee a single methodology allowing for product and building level sustainability assessments. An agreement could be reached in the course of 2019 when the new version of EN 15804 and the final Level(s) methodology will be published. This will be a year of change with both the European Parliament elections and the selection of a new European Commission leadership team. This time, the construction industry will have to secure political support for its sustainability tool and analyse how to further develop circular economy solutions.
With the application of the CPR as of July 2013, manufacturers are allowed to supply their product’s Declaration of Performance (DoP) by "electronic means". The legislator was wise enough not to define these means as the digital transformation of industry had already begun. These mandatory DoPs contain quality data that regretfully remains mostly unused and yet Building Information Modelling (BIM) systems are the talking point of our industry. The "Smart CE" concept has been developed to make full use of this legal option and to release technical data to the market in a BIM-friendly format. CEN Technical Committees are already working to deliver standardised formats, when available these will become the reference formats for CPR-related electronic data delivery.
If we now turn our attention to the European Commission’s clear intention to enforce the CPR’s Basic Works Requirement 7 - product information on the sustainable use of natural resources – we may see a need to explore an electronic format for our EPDs. Indeed, if sustainability data is combined with technical information within a mandatory declaration, we need to ensure that Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) data is the reference. Producers would deliver data to the market in a single, harmonised methodology.
Two additional topics shall be mentioned: the potential revision of the CPR and the global trend towards a more circular economy in Europe. The ongoing assessment of the regulation is a source of uncertainty for the industry. Our experts all agreed, we must urgently find solutions to resolve the CPR implementation problems, such as the hEN citation backlog, and to postpone any potential revision to quieter political times. At the same time the industry trust EPD and LCA information as the core input to assess circularity of construction products. Our industry is ready to deliver updated and reliable information based on a common European approach but this will only be possible if manufacturers keep the ownership of the information and take the responsibility of their updates.